The rest of this post will attempt to describe the ironies of the Ben Affleck backlash -- which I shall dub the bafflash.
Let's start at the beginning. Early Ben isn't that bad. "Good Will Hunting" was great, "Chasing Amy" sucked but not because of Ben (BNBOB), "Shakespeare in Love" was great, "Armageddon" was decent (for what it was), and "Dogma" was inexplicably terrible BNBOB.
Then there's middle-era Ben, which I confess I'm not too up on: "Forces of Nature," "Bounce," "Reindeer Games," "Pearl Harbor," "Jersey Girl." But I have seen "Gigli" and "Daredevil," and let me say, ouch. It might be fair to say these films are bad, possibly because of Ben (BOB).
But Ben's back!! Or so the critics would have us believe. "Hollywoodland" came out and Ben got all this good press for his acting prowess, but the movie's lame, so lame, in part BOB. Then he was in "Smokin' Aces," which was mildly entertaining, BNBOB. And now his new film is getting good reviews BOB, when in reality it's not that great, partly BOB.
The irony is this. The way I see things, critics have been hating on Ben, and now in recent years, because of a few projects, they're warming up to him. But by my estimation, his early work was okay (and the hatred undeserved), and his recent work is not good. To the critics and fans out there, I would say, in the immortal words of LL Cool J, "Don't call it a comeback." Oh, snap! The bafflash continues.
No comments:
Post a Comment