Wednesday, February 6, 2008

The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford

This movie is about the assassination of Jesse James by Robert Ford, who was a coward. This movie is also about as slow and odd and curiously alluring as any I've seen recently.

Brad Pitt can act ("12 Monkeys," "The One with the Rumor"), and here he has his moments as Jesse James, but they are moments. I've seen several movies with Casey Affleck, but this is the first where I've noticed him. He plays Bob Ford, a sniveling, brownnosing, starry-eyed fan of the myth of Jesse James, who insinuates himself into the James gang and his hero's life. He has an almost Mark-Wahlberg-in-"Boogie Nights" ability to convey complex emotion without saying a word. (I say "almost" because no one's as good as Mark Wahlberg in "Boogie Nights.") But when he speaks and his voice cracks with immaturity and pain, he's even better. In a way, he's like Daniel Day-Lewis to Brad Pitt's Paul Dano, in that Affleck is so good that the fact that Pitt doesn't stack up to him detracts from the movie.

At over two and a half hours long, it's 45 minutes too long. One more film where restraint would make it much better. Too much of the film dwelt on the supporting James gang, which in the end didn't matter that much. Not that they weren't worth watching, especially the heretofore unheard of Paul Schneider as a lubricious wordsmith. And then, in one of the bigger WTF moments in last year's crop of films, James Carville shows up, but he's not an actor, which means this is a cameo, which makes one ask, WTF?

The narrator's language is so faux magniloquent and stiff that it's almost like a parody of Wes Anderson narration. In the beginning, the narrator merely fills in the gaps. But by the end, the narrator is telling you things you're seeing. It shows a lack of confidence in the film and an insulting assumption the viewer can't discern what's going on. We see that James has melancholy eyes when he's looking at Ford, which means we don't need someone telling us he's looking at Ford with melancholy eyes.

Amazingly shot, the film cribs much of its look, feel, tone, and -- unfortunately -- pace from Terrence Malick, especially his lackluster "Days of Heaven." The train robbery in the beginning cuts between white sheets set among the trees and looming, foreboding, ominous outlines of Pitt standing in front of the train. The cinematography and the Dirty Three-esque string music bring to my mind how another myth-making film of the South, "The Birth of a Nation," might look today, a comparison that sets the tone and one of the themes for what is to follow. Much of the early part of the film is people looking at each other and watching the weather change, with storms over the plains. As Borat would say, "It's nice."

Jesse James's last words -- "Don't that picture look dusty?" -- begin a transcendent and serene sequence, an improbable but poetic end to his life. But the movie doesn't end. In a carefully crafted coda, the movie explores themes that up until that point lay underneath the surface, exploring the nature of celebrity, the creation of a cultural myth, the pains of betrayal, and the limits of self-aggrandizement. It takes a myth and reduces it to a human face, and that of a weakling. It's a curious comedown from a movie that didn't bother to build suspense or pretend to be anything other than a character study or morality play.

It's a fascinating failure of a movie that I sincerely hope to see again soon. It's literary, beautifully filmed, and well acted, and yet it's a plodding, scattershot mess, but it never becomes dull or unwatchable and is at times transfixing.

2 comments:

blahblahblog said...

Wow! I totally agree with you on this one. The narrator sort of threw me off at first, but then, as you say, I realized he was filling in gaps so I went with it. Then, again as you say, his narration becomes useless.
I like to use the subtitle feature on DVDs which worked out in this case b/c there's a lot of background singing/talking that's picked up that I wouldn't have heard otherwise--but it sort of added to the weirdness with the narration.
Most people don't think of Brad Pitt as anything more than a sex symbol, or Mr.Jolie, but he can be a pretty decent actor when he wants to be. I thought he was better in this film than your suggesting, but can concede he was definitely outshined by Affleck.
Yeah, this movie was way too long.
And yeah, WTF was up with the ragin' Cajun cameo? It was bad enough when he popped up on 30 Rock--still, he didn't suck.
And, I liked the whole turn at the end where they explore Howard's celebrity and his brother's guilt ridden descent into depression. I think they could've spent more time on that and less time on that one dude that screwed James's Uncle's wife.
In the end though, what I didn't get was why Howard was a coward. James was a maniac who would've killed him eventually. And, he wanted the reward. Furthermore, why would Jesse put down his guns and turn his back on someone he knew was about to kill him?
Weird.

Paul Boyer said...

Apparently, I, millions of other people, and the Academy disagrees, only partially, with your review. While I agree the acting is superb, and that the film has MANY good traits, I disagree on every point you made, regarding this "failure of a movie". To call it that is simply a shame. What am I talking about though? For god sakes you like the Bourne trilogy, why the hell am I trying to talk to you about a good movie.